Export limit exceeded: 49680 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (10788 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2016-1261 1 Juniper 1 Junos 2025-04-20 N/A
J-Web does not validate certain input that may lead to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issues or cause a denial of J-Web service (DoS).
CVE-2016-8737 1 Apache 1 Brooklyn 2025-04-20 N/A
In Apache Brooklyn before 0.10.0, the REST server is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF), which could permit a malicious web site to produce a link which, if clicked whilst a user is logged in to Brooklyn, would cause the server to execute the attacker's commands as the user. There is known to be a proof-of-concept exploit using this vulnerability.
CVE-2015-5170 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa 2025-04-20 8.8 High
Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks.
CVE-2016-5809 1 Schneider-electric 6 Ion5000, Ion7300, Ion7500 and 3 more 2025-04-20 N/A
An issue was discovered on Schneider Electric IONXXXX series power meters ION73XX series, ION75XX series, ION76XX series, ION8650 series, ION8800 series, and PM5XXX series. There is no CSRF Token generated to authenticate the user during a session. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow unauthorized configuration changes to be made and saved.
CVE-2017-0045 1 Microsoft 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista 2025-04-20 N/A
Windows DVD Maker in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows Vista SP2 does not properly parse crafted .msdvd files, which allows attackers to obtain information to compromise a target system, aka "Windows DVD Maker Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability."
CVE-2024-30617 1 Chamilo 1 Chamilo Lms 2025-04-18 5.4 Medium
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chamilo LMS 1.11.26 "/main/social/home.php," allows attackers to initiate a request that posts a fake post onto the user's social wall without their consent or knowledge.
CVE-2024-3756 1 Mf Gig Calendar Project 1 Mf Gig Calendar 2025-04-18 7.5 High
The MF Gig Calendar WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in Contributors and above delete arbitrary events via a CSRF attack
CVE-2024-51156 1 07fly 1 07flycms 2025-04-18 4.7 Medium
07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component 'erp.07fly.net:80/admin/SysNotifyUser/del.html?id=93'.
CVE-2024-51157 2 07fly, Zero Takeoff 2 07flycms, 07flycms 2025-04-18 4.7 Medium
07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component http://erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaSchedule/add.html.
CVE-2025-21576 1 Oracle 1 Commerce Platform 2025-04-17 5.4 Medium
Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Platform product of Oracle Commerce (component: Dynamo Personalization Server). Supported versions that are affected are 11.3.0, 11.3.1 and 11.3.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Commerce Platform. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Commerce Platform, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Commerce Platform accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Commerce Platform accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
CVE-2023-52072 1 Flycms Project 1 Flycms 2025-04-17 8.8 High
FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /system/site/userconfig_updagte.
CVE-2023-42234 1 Zucchetti 1 Helpdeskadvanced 2025-04-17 5.4 Medium
Pat Infinite Solutions HelpdeskAdvanced <= 11.0.33 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the WSCView function.
CVE-2022-4024 1 Genetechsolutions 1 Pie Register 2025-04-17 6.5 Medium
The Registration Forms WordPress plugin before 3.8.1.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF when deleting users via an init action handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary users (along with their posts)
CVE-2022-46402 1 Microchip 18 Bm70, Bm70 Firmware, Bm71 and 15 more 2025-04-17 6.5 Medium
The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) accepts PairCon_rmSend with incorrect values.
CVE-2025-31723 1 Jenkins 1 Simple Queue 2025-04-17 4.3 Medium
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Simple Queue Plugin 1.4.6 and earlier allows attackers to change and reset the build queue order.
CVE-2025-1762 1 Vollstart 1 Event Tickets With Ticket Scanner 2025-04-17 4.3 Medium
The Event Tickets with Ticket Scanner WordPress plugin before 2.5.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
CVE-2024-55088 1 Getsimple-ce 1 Getsimple Cms 2025-04-17 8.8 High
GetSimple CMS CE 3.3.19 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the backend plugin module.
CVE-2024-27694 1 Flycms Project 1 Flycms 2025-04-16 7.4 High
FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the /system/share/ztree_category_edit.
CVE-2021-32929 1 Uffizio 1 Gps Tracker 2025-04-16 4.3 Medium
All versions of Uffizio GPS Tracker may allow an attacker to perform unintended actions on behalf of a user.
CVE-2021-43937 1 Smartptt 1 Scada Server 2025-04-16 7.6 High
Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.