Search Results (88 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2018-19440 1 Trustedfirmware 1 Trusted Firmware-a 2026-06-05 5.3 Medium
ARM Trusted Firmware-A allows information disclosure.
CVE-2017-9607 1 Trustedfirmware 1 Trusted Firmware-a 2026-06-05 7.0 High
The BL1 FWU SMC handling code in ARM Trusted Firmware before 1.4 might allow attackers to write arbitrary data to secure memory, bypass the bl1_plat_mem_check protection mechanism, cause a denial of service, or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted AArch32 image, which triggers an integer overflow.
CVE-2023-31339 2 Amd, Trustedfirmware 43 Trusted Firmware-a, Zu11eg, Zu15eg and 40 more 2026-06-05 4.8 Medium
Improper input validation in ARM® Trusted Firmware used in AMD’s Zynq™ UltraScale+™) MPSoC/RFSoC may allow a privileged attacker to perform out of bound reads, potentially resulting in data leakage and denial of service.
CVE-2017-15031 1 Trustedfirmware 1 Trusted Firmware-a 2026-06-05 7.5 High
In all versions of ARM Trusted Firmware up to and including v1.4, not initializing or saving/restoring the PMCR_EL0 register can leak secure world timing information.
CVE-2026-34875 2 Mbed-tls, Trustedfirmware 4 Mbedtls, Tf-psa-crypto, Mbed Tls and 1 more 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS through 3.6.5 and TF-PSA-Crypto 1.0.0. A buffer overflow can occur in public key export for FFDH keys.
CVE-2026-34871 3 Arm, Mbed-tls, Trustedfirmware 4 Mbed Tls, Mbedtls, Tf-psa-crypto and 1 more 2026-06-05 6.7 Medium
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 3.6.6 and 4.x before 4.1.0 and TF-PSA-Crypto before 1.1.0. There is a Predictable Seed in a Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG).
CVE-2026-25835 3 Arm, Mbed-tls, Trustedfirmware 5 Mbed Tls, Mbedtls, Tf-psa-crypto and 2 more 2026-06-05 7.7 High
Mbed TLS before 3.6.6 and TF-PSA-Crypto before 1.1.0 misuse seeds in a Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG).
CVE-2023-43615 4 Arm, Fedoraproject, Mbed and 1 more 4 Mbed Tls, Fedora, Mbedtls and 1 more 2026-06-05 7.5 High
Mbed TLS 2.x before 2.28.5 and 3.x before 3.5.0 has a Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2019-16910 4 Arm, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more 5 Mbed Crypto, Mbed Tls, Debian Linux and 2 more 2026-06-05 5.3 Medium
Arm Mbed TLS before 2.19.0 and Arm Mbed Crypto before 2.0.0, when deterministic ECDSA is enabled, use an RNG with insufficient entropy for blinding, which might allow an attacker to recover a private key via side-channel attacks if a victim signs the same message many times. (For Mbed TLS, the fix is also available in versions 2.7.12 and 2.16.3.)
CVE-2024-49195 2 Mbed, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbedtls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
Mbed TLS 3.5.x through 3.6.x before 3.6.2 has a buffer underrun in pkwrite when writing an opaque key pair
CVE-2018-9989 3 Arm, Debian, Trustedfirmware 3 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 7.5 High
ARM mbed TLS before 2.1.11, before 2.7.2, and before 2.8.0 has a buffer over-read in ssl_parse_server_psk_hint() that could cause a crash on invalid input.
CVE-2021-36647 2 Arm, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbed Tls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 4.7 Medium
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in the function mbedtls_mpi_exp_mod() in lignum.c in Mbed TLS Mbed TLS all versions before 3.0.0, 2.27.0 or 2.16.11 allows attackers with access to precise enough timing and memory access information (typically an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave such as SGX or the TrustZone secure world) to recover the private keys used in RSA.
CVE-2022-46393 3 Arm, Fedoraproject, Trustedfirmware 3 Mbed Tls, Fedora, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. There is a potential heap-based buffer overflow and heap-based buffer over-read in DTLS if MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID is enabled and MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_IN_LEN_MAX > 2 * MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX.
CVE-2026-34876 2 Mbed-tls, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbedtls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.6. An out-of-bounds read vulnerability in mbedtls_ccm_finish() in library/ccm.c allows attackers to obtain adjacent CCM context data via invocation of the multipart CCM API with an oversized tag_len parameter. This is caused by missing validation of the tag_len parameter against the size of the internal 16-byte authentication buffer. The issue affects the public multipart CCM API in Mbed TLS 3.x, where mbedtls_ccm_finish() can be invoked directly by applications. In Mbed TLS 4.x versions prior to the fix, the same missing validation exists in the internal implementation; however, the function is not exposed as part of the public API. Exploitation requires application-level invocation of the multipart CCM API.
CVE-2026-34877 3 Arm, Mbed, Trustedfirmware 3 Mbed Tls, Mbedtls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS versions from 2.19.0 up to 3.6.5, Mbed TLS 4.0.0. Insufficient protection of serialized SSL context or session structures allows an attacker who can modify the serialized structures to induce memory corruption, leading to arbitrary code execution. This is caused by Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs.
CVE-2018-19608 2 Arm, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbed Tls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 N/A
Arm Mbed TLS before 2.14.1, before 2.7.8, and before 2.1.17 allows a local unprivileged attacker to recover the plaintext of RSA decryption, which is used in RSA-without-(EC)DH(E) cipher suites.
CVE-2017-2784 1 Trustedfirmware 1 Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 N/A
An exploitable free of a stack pointer vulnerability exists in the x509 certificate parsing code of ARM mbed TLS before 1.3.19, 2.x before 2.1.7, and 2.4.x before 2.4.2. A specially crafted x509 certificate, when parsed by mbed TLS library, can cause an invalid free of a stack pointer leading to a potential remote code execution. In order to exploit this vulnerability, an attacker can act as either a client or a server on a network to deliver malicious x509 certificates to vulnerable applications.
CVE-2024-45159 1 Trustedfirmware 1 Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).
CVE-2024-45158 2 Mbed, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbedtls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.6 before 3.6.1. A stack buffer overflow in mbedtls_ecdsa_der_to_raw() and mbedtls_ecdsa_raw_to_der() can occur when the bits parameter is larger than the largest supported curve. In some configurations with PSA disabled, all values of bits are affected. (This never happens in internal library calls, but can affect applications that call these functions directly.)
CVE-2025-49600 2 Mbed, Trustedfirmware 2 Mbedtls, Mbed Tls 2026-06-05 4.9 Medium
In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtls_lms_verify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtls_lms_verify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtls_lms_verify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions create_merkle_leaf_value and create_merkle_internal_value are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tc_candidate_root_node) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification.