Export limit exceeded: 421028 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2127 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18184 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18185 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.3 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information and modify system configurations due to missing authentication for a critical function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18490 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-07 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via Java native deserialization on the PayDir Business Rules Manager RMI SSL endpoint (BrmRMISSLServerSocketFactory.java:95, EP8). An adjacent-network attacker can deliver a crafted serialized payload to achieve arbitrary code execution, exposing all PayDir credentials and enabling manipulation of payment business rules. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18505 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to open redirect in the PMP `HostHeaderFilter` (`HostHeaderFilter.java:151`). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a request with a manipulated `Host` header to redirect authenticated operators to attacker-controlled sites, enabling credential phishing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18872 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the FTM UI NetworkAcknowledgement React component (NetworkAcknowledgement.jsx:42). A malicious actor can inject script into stored network acknowledgement data that executes in authenticated operator browsers, enabling session hijacking and unauthorized operator-level payment actions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18875 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.3 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to RAG poisoning via unauthenticated runbook upsert (CWE-74) in the FTM AI agent server (api.vectordb.runbooks.js:51). An unauthenticated attacker can insert malicious runbook content into the agent's vector database to steer AI-driven MCP tool calls, potentially triggering unauthorized payment actions or exfiltrating payment data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19087 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation within the container due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19179 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to manipulate database queries due to improper neutralization of special elements in a boolean expression. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19267 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.2 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to missing authentication on the Business Rules Manager commands REST endpoint (`CommandsResource.java:31`). A local actor can invoke unauthenticated commands to cause resource exhaustionand halt business-rule management functions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18161 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to falsify transaction audit logs due to improper validation of a client-supplied HTTP header. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18162 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input within the new Function constructor. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18163 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper deserialization of untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18169 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of symbolic links. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18170 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to allocation of resources without limits or throttling. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8659 | 3 Debian, Envoyproxy, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Envoy, Openshift Service Mesh and 1 more | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 may consume excessive amounts of memory when proxying HTTP/1.1 requests or responses with many small (i.e. 1 byte) chunks. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8661 | 2 Envoyproxy, Redhat | 3 Envoy, Openshift Service Mesh, Service Mesh | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 may consume excessive amounts of memory when responding internally to pipelined requests. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52355 | 2 Libtiff, Redhat | 7 Libtiff, Ai Inference Server, Discovery and 4 more | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| An out-of-memory flaw was found in libtiff that could be triggered by passing a crafted tiff file to the TIFFRasterScanlineSize64() API. This flaw allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted input with a size smaller than 379 KB. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48710 | 3 Encode, Kludex, Redhat | 9 Starlette, Starlette, Ai Inference Server and 6 more | 2026-10-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75886 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| A flaw was found in openshift/console. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a misconfiguration in the CatalogdHandler, which lacks proper authentication, and the forwarding of the `openshift-session-token` cookie. This allows the attacker to send requests to the in-cluster catalogd service, leading to the disclosure of the internal operator-catalog index and providing a relay into the openshift-catalogd namespace. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1784 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-01 | 8.8 High |
| The Route OpenShift resource allows to define routes to make pods reachable at a subdomain through HAProxy. It was found that the checks performed on the spec.path YAML stanza in a Route document was insufficient and could allow a controlled injection of the HAProxy configuration. | ||||