Export limit exceeded: 407371 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407371 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-102776 | 1 Svenbluege.de | 1 Event Gallery For Joomla | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Cross-site request forgery of list tasks of the backend in Event Gallery extension < 6.6.0 - Eight tasks which the buttons of the back-end lists call did not check the form token: setting the default payment method, shipping method, image type set, order status and watermark; putting an event into the shop or taking it out; choosing the main image of an event and whether an image is shown only as the main image; and sorting the images of an event. A prepared page on another web site could trigger them in the name of a logged in administrator and change those settings and flags. Nothing can be deleted or read this way; orders are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57099 | 1 Microsoft | 3 .asp.netcore, .asp.netcore, Asp.net Core Odata | 2026-10-05 | 7.5 High |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56599 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-05 | 2.2 Low |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Cookie Attribute Configuration vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to exploit missing security attributes such as SameSite, HttpOnly, Secure, and restrictive Paths, enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), session hijacking via Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56589 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-05 | 7.2 High |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject and store malicious scripts within the application that execute when a victim views the affected page, enabling session hijacking and the theft of sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67106 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability because two exposed API endpoints return sensitive data. This information could enable an attacker to launch further, more serious attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67105 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-05 | 7.4 High |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Communication vulnerability, which could allow an attacker with internal network access to intercept unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services, enabling the extraction of sensitive data and potential man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67104 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to analyze publicly accessible JavaScript files, enabling the discovery of hidden administrative API endpoints for further targeted exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96990 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Erlang bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94653 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94652 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Missing release of memory after effective lifetime vulnerability in Apache Thrift c++ bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94648 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift dart bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94645 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Improper validation of specified quantity in input, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift nodejs bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94644 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94642 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94639 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94638 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Thrift, Hummingbird | 2026-10-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift PHP bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94637 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | 7.5 High |
| Improper handling of highly compressed data (data amplification) vulnerability in Apache Thrift Go bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82041 | 1 Utmstack | 1 Utmstack | 2026-10-05 | 9.9 Critical |
| UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in UTMIncidentCommandWebsocket.processCommand(), the handler mapped to the /command/{hostname} STOMP destination, where no role check or command allowlist is applied before forwarding supplied commands. Any authenticated user, regardless of role, can send arbitrary operating-system commands over gRPC to any connected agent, resulting in command execution on monitored endpoints where agent processes commonly run as root or SYSTEM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71889 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 3 Bc-fja, Bc-java, Bc-lts-java | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance("PKIX", "BC"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 self-issued exemption for the final certificate as sec. 6.1.3 requires, and skip the sec. 6.1.4 (g) constraint-accumulation step for the target. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, which carries only the org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce copy of the reviewer. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61373 | 1 Apache | 1 Thrift | 2026-10-05 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java TSaslNonblockingServer. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||