Export limit exceeded: 397455 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (397455 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73581 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2026-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. Both the OpenSSL and OpenSSL-FFM TLS implementations ignore CRLs when certificate uses a keystore. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.25, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.58, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.121. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Other unsupported versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.26, 10.1.59, 9.0.122, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18439 | 2 Themeum, Wordpress | 2 Tutor Lms – Elearning And Online Course Solution, Wordpress | 2026-09-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 4.0.7 via the tutor_quiz_builder_save AJAX action due to missing validation that nested question_id, answer_id, deleted_question_ids[], and deleted_answer_ids[] values in the submitted payload belong to a quiz/topic/course the requester is authorized to manage. The handler only validates the top-level course_id, topic_id, and (when supplied) payload['ID'], but the nested identifiers are passed straight into $wpdb->update/DELETE statements in QuizBuilder::save_questions(), QuizBuilder::save_question_answers(), and QuizBuilder::handle_delete(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Instructor-level access and above, to overwrite the content and re-parent arbitrary quiz questions/answers belonging to other instructors or administrators, and to delete arbitrary quiz question and answer rows. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18176 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18173 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 3.7 Low |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper enforcement of mutual TLS authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18163 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper deserialization of untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18162 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input within the new Function constructor. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18153 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18152 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18132 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18131 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18095 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18074 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17645 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17644 | 1 Ibm | 2 Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and modify transaction data due to the use of hard-coded credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17635 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper configuration of HTTP method-based security constraints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17620 | 1 Ibm | 2 Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift | 2026-09-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift 4.0.6.0 through 4.0.6.0.0.6.0 Refresh (Operator 4.4.6+20260807.081800)4.0.7.04.0.8.04.0.9.04.0.10.0 Interim Fix 064 IBM Financial Transaction Manager transmits sensitive or security-critical data in cleartext in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized actors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17102 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16346 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-23 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15915 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-23 | 6.2 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to recursive copying of build context directories into container images. | ||||
| CVE-2008-4128 | 1 Cisco | 2 871 Integrated Services Router, Ios | 2026-09-23 | 8.1 High |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HTTP Administration component in Cisco IOS 12.4 on the 871 Integrated Services Router allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via (1) a certain "show privilege" command to the /level/15/exec/- URI, and (2) a certain "alias exec" command to the /level/15/exec/-/configure/http URI. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||