Export limit exceeded: 397548 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (5015 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23973 | 1 Silabs | 1 Gecko Os | 2025-09-30 | 8.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Silicon Labs Gecko OS. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of HTTP GET requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10559 | 2 Razormist, Sourcecodester | 2 Airport Booking Management System, Airport Booking Management System | 2025-09-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Airport Booking Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function Details. The manipulation of the argument passport/name leads to buffer overflow. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Other parameters might be affected as well. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7490 | 1 Microchip | 1 Advanced Software Framework | 2025-09-29 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Microchip Techology Advanced Software Framework example DHCP server can cause remote code execution through a buffer overflow. This vulnerability is associated with program files tinydhcpserver.C and program routines lwip_dhcp_find_option. This issue affects Advanced Software Framework: through 3.52.0.2574. ASF is no longer being supported. Apply provided workaround or migrate to an actively maintained framework. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36525 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2025-09-29 | 7.5 High |
| When a BIG-IP APM virtual server is configured to use a PingAccess profile, undisclosed requests can cause TMM to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10034 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-825, Dir-825, Dir-825 Firmware | 2025-09-29 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-825 1.08.01. This impacts the function get_ping6_app_stat of the file ping6_response.cg of the component httpd. Performing manipulation of the argument ping6_ipaddr results in buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0762 | 3 Intel, Phoenix, Phoenixtech | 582 300, 300t, Atom X7211e and 579 more | 2025-09-29 | 7.5 High |
| Potential buffer overflow in unsafe UEFI variable handling in Phoenix SecureCore™ for select Intel platforms This issue affects: Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Kaby Lake: from 4.0.1.1 before 4.0.1.998; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Coffee Lake: from 4.1.0.1 before 4.1.0.562; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Ice Lake: from 4.2.0.1 before 4.2.0.323; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Comet Lake: from 4.2.1.1 before 4.2.1.287; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Tiger Lake: from 4.3.0.1 before 4.3.0.236; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Jasper Lake: from 4.3.1.1 before 4.3.1.184; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Alder Lake: from 4.4.0.1 before 4.4.0.269; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Raptor Lake: from 4.5.0.1 before 4.5.0.218; Phoenix SecureCore™ for Intel Meteor Lake: from 4.5.1.1 before 4.5.1.15. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39750 | 1 Ibm | 1 Analytics Content Hub | 2025-09-29 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Analytics Content Hub 2.0 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow due to improper return length checking. A remote authenticated attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52868 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: thermal: core: prevent potential string overflow The dev->id value comes from ida_alloc() so it's a number between zero and INT_MAX. If it's too high then these sprintf()s will overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55611 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l B1, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formLanguageChange function via the nextPage parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55606 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ax3, Ax3 Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Tenda AX3 V16.03.12.10_CN is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the fromAdvSetMacMtuWan function via the serverName parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55605 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ax3, Ax3 Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Tenda AX3 V16.03.12.10_CN is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the saveParentControlInfo function via the deviceName parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55603 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ax3, Ax3 Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Tenda AX3 V16.03.12.10_CN is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the fromSetSysTime function via the ntpServer parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55602 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSysCmd function via the submit-url parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55599 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formWlanSetup function via the parameter f_wds_wepKey. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9007 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ch22, Ch22 Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in Tenda CH22 1.0.0.1. Affected by this issue is the function formeditFileName of the file /goform/editFileName. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9006 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ch22, Ch22 Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in Tenda CH22 1.0.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formdelFileName of the file /goform/delFileName. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10815 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac20, Ac20 Firmware | 2025-09-25 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in Tenda AC20 up to 16.03.08.12. Affected by this issue is the function strcpy of the file /goform/SetPptpServerCfg of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument startIp leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25723 | 1 Gpac | 1 Gpac | 2025-09-25 | 8.4 High |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in GPAC version 2.5 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10803 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac23, Ac23 Firmware | 2025-09-24 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in Tenda AC23 up to 16.03.07.52. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sscanf of the file /goform/SetPptpServerCfg of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument startIp leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48984 | 2 Arm, Mbed | 2 Mbed Os, Mbed | 2025-09-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in MBed OS 6.16.0. When parsing hci reports, the hci parsing software dynamically determines the length of a list of reports by reading a byte from an input stream. It then fetches the length of the first report, uses it to calculate the beginning of the second report, etc. In doing this, it tracks the largest report so it can later allocate a buffer that fits every individual report (but only one at a time). It does not, however, validate that these addresses are all contained within the buffer passed to hciEvtProcessLeExtAdvReport. It is then possible, though unlikely, that the buffer designated to hold the reports is allocated in such a way that one of these out-of-bounds length fields is contained within the new buffer. When the (n-1)th report is copied, it overwrites the length field of the nth report. This now corrupted length field is then used for a memcpy into the new buffer, which may lead to a buffer overflow. | ||||