Export limit exceeded: 399094 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24300 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-4076 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 7 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Client queries that trigger serving stale data and that also require lookups in local authoritative zone data may result in an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.13 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, 9.11.33-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.13-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31081 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A heap-based buffer over-read vulnerability was found in the X.org server's ProcXIPassiveGrabDevice() function. This issue occurs when byte-swapped length values are used in replies, potentially leading to memory leakage and segmentation faults, particularly when triggered by a client with a different endianness. This vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to cause the X server to read heap memory values and then transmit them back to the client until encountering an unmapped page, resulting in a crash. Despite the attacker's inability to control the specific memory copied into the replies, the small length values typically stored in a 32-bit integer can result in significant attempted out-of-bounds reads. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31083 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| A use-after-free vulnerability was found in the ProcRenderAddGlyphs() function of Xorg servers. This issue occurs when AllocateGlyph() is called to store new glyphs sent by the client to the X server, potentially resulting in multiple entries pointing to the same non-refcounted glyphs. Consequently, ProcRenderAddGlyphs() may free a glyph, leading to a use-after-free scenario when the same glyph pointer is subsequently accessed. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system by sending a specially crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6485 | 2 Getbootstrap, Redhat | 2 Bootstrap, Discovery | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been discovered in bootstrap that could enable Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. The vulnerability is associated with the data-loading-text attribute within the button plugin. This vulnerability can be exploited by injecting malicious JavaScript code into the attribute, which would then be executed when the button's loading state is triggered. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6501 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in NetworkManager. When a system running NetworkManager with DEBUG logs enabled and an interface eth1 configured with LLDP enabled, a malicious user could inject a malformed LLDP packet. NetworkManager would crash, leading to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5321 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes clusters with Windows nodes where BUILTIN\Users may be able to read container logs and NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users may be able to modify container logs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43803 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| The Bare Metal Operator (BMO) implements a Kubernetes API for managing bare metal hosts in Metal3. The `BareMetalHost` (BMH) CRD allows the `userData`, `metaData`, and `networkData` for the provisioned host to be specified as links to Kubernetes Secrets. There are fields for both the `Name` and `Namespace` of the Secret, meaning that versions of the baremetal-operator prior to 0.8.0, 0.6.2, and 0.5.2 will read a `Secret` from any namespace. A user with access to create or edit a `BareMetalHost` can thus exfiltrate a `Secret` from another namespace by using it as e.g. the `userData` for provisioning some host (note that this need not be a real host, it could be a VM somewhere). BMO will only read a key with the name `value` (or `userData`, `metaData`, or `networkData`), so that limits the exposure somewhat. `value` is probably a pretty common key though. Secrets used by _other_ `BareMetalHost`s in different namespaces are always vulnerable. It is probably relatively unusual for anyone other than cluster administrators to have RBAC access to create/edit a `BareMetalHost`. This vulnerability is only meaningful, if the cluster has users other than administrators and users' privileges are limited to their respective namespaces. The patch prevents BMO from accepting links to Secrets from other namespaces as BMH input. Any BMH configuration is only read from the same namespace only. The problem is patched in BMO releases v0.7.0, v0.6.2 and v0.5.2 and users should upgrade to those versions. Prior upgrading, duplicate the BMC Secrets to the namespace where the corresponding BMH is. After upgrade, remove the old Secrets. As a workaround, an operator can configure BMO RBAC to be namespace scoped for Secrets, instead of cluster scoped, to prevent BMO from accessing Secrets from other namespaces. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3624 | 1 Redhat | 1 Mirror Registry | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in how Quay's database is stored in plain-text in mirror-registry on the jinja's config.yaml file. This flaw allows a malicious actor with access to this file to gain access to Quay's database. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34155 | 1 Redhat | 15 Ceph Storage, Cost Management, Cryostat and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Calling any of the Parse functions on Go source code which contains deeply nested literals can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34447 | 1 Redhat | 3 Amq Broker, Apache Camel Spring Boot, Quarkus | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in the Bouncy Castle Crypto Package For Java before BC TLS Java 1.0.19 (ships with BC Java 1.78, BC Java (LTS) 2.73.6) and before BC FIPS TLS Java 1.0.19. When endpoint identification is enabled in the BCJSSE and an SSL socket is created without an explicit hostname (as happens with HttpsURLConnection), hostname verification could be performed against a DNS-resolved IP address in some situations, opening up a possibility of DNS poisoning. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3597 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not correctly validate its client step-up authentication in org.keycloak.authentication. This flaw allows a remote user authenticated with a password to register a false second authentication factor along with an existing one and bypass authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24788 | 1 Redhat | 15 Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage, Cost Management and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| A malformed DNS message in response to a query can cause the Lookup functions to get stuck in an infinite loop. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34158 | 2 Go Build Constraint, Redhat | 11 Go Standard Library, Cryostat, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37298 | 2 Gorillatoolkit, Redhat | 6 Schema, Advanced Cluster Security, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| gorilla/schema converts structs to and from form values. Prior to version 1.4.1 Running `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct that has a field of type `[]struct{...}` opens it up to malicious attacks regarding memory allocations, taking advantage of the sparse slice functionality. Any use of `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct with arrays of other structs could be vulnerable to this memory exhaustion vulnerability. Version 1.4.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2157 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low |
| A flaw was found in Foreman/Red Hat Satellite. Improper file permissions allow low-privileged OS users to monitor and access temporary files under /var/tmp, exposing sensitive command outputs, such as /etc/shadow. This issue can lead to information disclosure and privilege escalation if exploited effectively. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36472 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| In GNOME Shell through 45.7, a portal helper can be launched automatically (without user confirmation) based on network responses provided by an adversary (e.g., an adversary who controls the local Wi-Fi network), and subsequently loads untrusted JavaScript code, which may lead to resource consumption or other impacts depending on the JavaScript code's behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27280 | 2 Redhat, Ruby-lang | 2 Enterprise Linux, Ruby | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A buffer-overread issue was discovered in StringIO 3.0.1, as distributed in Ruby 3.0.x through 3.0.6 and 3.1.x through 3.1.4. The ungetbyte and ungetc methods on a StringIO can read past the end of a string, and a subsequent call to StringIO.gets may return the memory value. 3.0.3 is the main fixed version; however, for Ruby 3.0 users, a fixed version is stringio 3.0.1.1, and for Ruby 3.1 users, a fixed version is stringio 3.0.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30171 | 1 Redhat | 6 Amq Broker, Apache Camel Spring Boot, Camel Quarkus and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Bouncy Castle Java TLS API and JSSE Provider before 1.78. Timing-based leakage may occur in RSA based handshakes because of exception processing. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30172 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 6 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Amq Broker, Apache Camel Spring Boot and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs before 1.78. An Ed25519 verification code infinite loop can occur via a crafted signature and public key. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2419 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's redirect_uri validation logic. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to the theft of an access token, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. It is very similar to CVE-2023-6291. | ||||