Export limit exceeded: 22957 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (22957 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-71904 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the tr069TestInform function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of dangerous characters before the event_code field is concatenated into a system command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71910 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71915 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the jsonstatus function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the usescript, usefile, and option fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71927 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the rebDevice function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71925 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the getDetail function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71917 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71930 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-24 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setTime function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1960 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Nfv Infrastructure Software | 2026-08-24 | 4.4 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system (OS) of an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1959 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Nfv Infrastructure Software | 2026-08-24 | 4.4 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system (OS) of an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1971 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Nfv Infrastructure Software | 2026-08-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the web portal of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection attack and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the web portal framework. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing malicious input during web portal authentication. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78177 | 1 Tanstack | 1 Devtools-vite | 2026-08-24 | 4.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in TanStack devtools-vite 0.7.0. Affected by this issue is the function installPackage of the file packages/devtools-bundler-core/src/package-manager.ts of the component Development Devtools Event Bus. The manipulation of the argument packageName results in os command injection. Attacking locally is a requirement. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78161 | 1 Warmcat | 1 Libwebsockets | 2026-08-24 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in warmcat libwebsockets 4.5.0. Impacted is the function report_raw_cbor of the file lib/misc/lecp.c of the component LECP CBOR Recording. The manipulation results in out-of-bounds write. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The patch is identified as 1d44554a1bb262db63ff4e240152a9deecd99054. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76840 | 1 Rustdesk | 1 Rustdesk | 2026-08-24 | 9.6 Critical |
| RustDesk's Windows clipboard redirection copies a peer-supplied length into a fixed-size caller buffer without an upper bound check. When an OLE paste consumer such as explorer.exe calls IStream::Read with a buffer of cb bytes, CliprdrStream_Read in libs/clipboard/src/windows/wf_cliprdr.c requests that many bytes of a remote file through cliprdr_send_request_filecontents and then executes CopyMemory(pv, clipboard->req_fdata, clipboard->req_fsize), where req_fsize is taken verbatim from the peer's CLIPRDR FileContentsResponse by wf_cliprdr_server_file_contents_response (req_fsize = fileContentsResponse->cbRequested) and is never clamped to cb anywhere in the chain. The function's only length comparison, req_fsize < cb, handles the short-read case and is evaluated after the copy has already occurred. A malicious or compromised peer that answers a small file-contents read with an oversized response therefore writes attacker-chosen data past the end of the paste consumer's heap buffer when the local user pastes clipboard file contents offered by the remote side. The file is a fork of FreeRDP's client/Windows/wf_cliprdr.c, where the same defect is CVE-2026-68579, fixed in FreeRDP 3.30.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16958 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16951 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16946 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 7.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to a heap buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16944 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16943 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 8.2 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16936 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 8.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16934 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-24 | 8.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||